Another thing I noticed while running these tests: After a fresh FAT format of my Transcend 2GB card, VFSMark and CardSpeed both reported good results on the first run ("751" and "Great", respectively). However, on the second run (immediately after the first run, no changes to the card) VFSMark dropped to 492, and CardSpeed completely failed the card, saying it was not recommended at all. And testing again after that yielded the same (bad) results.
Do I have a defective card, or is there something else at play here that I'm unaware of? My previous cards were always consistent with speed tests.
|