Quote:
Originally Posted by zelgo
Have you compared it to the HP Mini? Would be interested in hearing your opinion.
|
I'm much less familiar with the HP mini than the Wind or the 1000H.
Except for handling one at a trade show -- (shoved into my hands by an over eager HP rep -- perhaps wanting to impress this once and future crowned head) I literally don't really have a feel for them.
I do know that the early versions used a non-Intel non-Atom cpu -- which made it appreciably slower than its fraternal netbooks.
In reaction to critcism it received, and presumably disappointing sales, HP has largely joined the Atom parade.
Since I often use the netbook for work related tasks (planning coups, insurrections, and planetary conquest) having XP is for me a requirement. And because its always easier to add Linux later, and the cost differential for XP is small, its a no brainer to insist on XP.
Most netbooks speed specs are more or less comparable.
They differ mostly in their hard drive capacity, (tiny flash drives -- up to 160gb hard drives), their battery stamina (up to 7 ?? hrs,), g or n WiFi, whether they include bluetooth, on whether they use XP, and on their screen size.
Most of all though, they differ in their keyboard arrangements -- and their ergonomics.
Asus has produced so many variations of netbooks that they seem to have mostly figured out the best configurations (sort of like the old untrue myth of how a million monkeys would eventually produce the works of Shakesphere -- it only took one, btw).
The HP, especially initially, was
under powered and over priced. To be gentle about it, it was really a joke. For nearly $600 HP deigned to let you have a 1.2ghz non-intel cpu running linux on a 8.9" screen. As if.
Even their
current line up is miserly in terms of memory, features, and often screen size.
Their
"flagship" even now sells for nearly $500 -- but only comes with a 60gb drive. Give me a break.
Some speak well of their keyboards -- but like I said, I have never really used one.