|
11/03/2009, 02:51 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,871
Thanks: 21
Thanked 20 Times in 18 Posts
|
Boxwave -vs- Phantom Skinz
I need to order a screen protector, but I'm still not quite sure which one to go with. Everybody seems to be screaming "Phantom Skinz! Phantom Skinz!", but I haven't heard anybody say that Phantom Skinz is actually better than Boxwave. Boxwave has never done me wrong before, it still leaves the screen smooth (which is needed for gestures and flicking things around), it doesn't need water to apply, and it can be washed and reused (tho, I've never actually been able to reuse one myself).
Soo.... here's the options:
- Boxwave screen protector
- Phantom Skinz screen protector
- Phantom Skinz "full body" protector for both sides
Anybody actually have real-world experience with BOTH of these brands?
Any reason not to get the "full body" protector from Phantom Skinz (i.e. - interferes with Touchstone, doesn't stick to Touchstone back, too slippery, too easy to peel off, etc.)?
TIA!
|
|
|
11/03/2009, 03:42 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 315
Thanks: 6
Thanked 42 Times in 40 Posts
|
Well, the big difference to me is that the PhantomSkinz actually wraps around the sides ... doesn't look like Boxwave extends that far to me (even the "extended coverage"). The Pre is kind of difficult to fit because it's so rounded. Seems like the Boxwave might catch on something and come loose ... but maybe not, and maybe that's really a better way to do it on the Pre?
I have the PhantomSkinz and really like it. Only the front, didn't want to cover the Touchstone back because the texture is actually kind of nice, and didn't see the need in it (don't care about scratches on the back).
Having said that, I did a pretty extensive search and a lot of reading before settling on PhantomSkinz, and I think Boxwave would have been my second choice. People who had it seemed to like it.
|
|
|
11/03/2009, 04:28 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 114
Thanks: 27
Thanked 27 Times in 16 Posts
|
I used Boxwave on my Treo and I ended up getting PhantomSkinz for my Pre.
Having used both, the Boxwave is the better material; extremely transparent. However, since the Boxwave didn't cover the sides, I went with PhantomSkinz. It does what it's supposed to do. If Boxwave ever changes their design, I'll go back to them.
|
|
|
11/03/2009, 04:51 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 65
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by grndslm
IAnybody actually have real-world experience with BOTH of these brands?
|
Actually, yes. I am a long-time BoxWave fan - I've supported multiple fleets of mobile devices over the last ten years. I love BoxWave screen protectors for their clarity and protection as well as their feel. Right now we're mostly rolling with Treo 800Ws and Treo Pros, about twenty in total with BoxWave protectors. We have four Pres and a few iPhones for good measure.
That said, I'm using a PhantomSkinz on my Pre. Of the four Pres, two have BoxWave protectors and two have PhantomSkinz. Here's the good and bad of each (in my opinion, of course):
BoxWave - pros: one piece, no water for application, smooth feel.
BoxWave - cons: kind of thick, pocket lint infests the edges (due to the curvature of the Pre), doesn't cover the whole front of the device.
PhantomSkinz - pros: smooth feel (better than Invisible Shield and BodyGuardz), covers the front and sides nicely, easier install with fewer bubbles, good protection, nice clean corners.
PhantomSkinz - cons: after about four months the edges begin to come loose, install takes about twenty minutes, needs a solid overnight to dry clear.
If you have any further questions, let me know.
|
|
|
11/03/2009, 05:37 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 194
Thanks: 39
Thanked 35 Times in 27 Posts
|
I've had the Boxwave screen protector on for 4 months. It's great. Transparent, easy to forget it's there. The PhantomSkinz install process scared me (I'm not good with arts and crafts. I was pretty sure I'd screw it up). I used the Seidio Innocase for a while until it broke.
__________________
Palm V -->m505 -->Tungsten T3-->T5->Centro-->Pre!
|
|
|
11/03/2009, 08:25 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,871
Thanks: 21
Thanked 20 Times in 18 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsage
That said, I'm using a PhantomSkinz on my Pre. Of the four Pres, two have BoxWave protectors and two have PhantomSkinz. Here's the good and bad of each (in my opinion, of course):
PhantomSkinz - pros: smooth feel (better than Invisible Shield and BodyGuardz), covers the front and sides nicely, easier install with fewer bubbles, good protection, nice clean corners.
PhantomSkinz - cons: after about four months the edges begin to come loose, install takes about twenty minutes, needs a solid overnight to dry clear.
If you have any further questions, let me know.
|
Uh.. yes. I definitely have some more questions for you.
Which of the 3 options do you think would be best for the stock Palm case? Seems like a pretty snug fit as it is, so does it look like the Boxwave would catch on the case? I guess the "full body" protector from PS doesn't seem to be worth it so much.
If both of them will have the edges snagged every few months or so... that's kinda upsetting. I guess since the PS is actually curved and the Boxwave isn't... that about seals the deal. I read a post somewhere where the Boxwave rep was talking about how they changed the design... I dunno. Guess I might email them and see what they say.
|
|
|
11/03/2009, 09:25 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 65
Thanks: 9
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by grndslm
Which of the 3 options do you think would be best for the stock Palm case?
|
The leather side case with the pull-out ribbon? If so, no protector seems to work well with it -it's too snug. I have one - I stuffed a slightly-larger-than-a-Pre block of wood in it for a week to stretch it, but it's still to tight.
Right now I'm using an EB Copilot case. It works very well, is slim enough to wear under a suit and doesn't affect the skin in any way.
|
|
|
11/03/2009, 10:00 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,871
Thanks: 21
Thanked 20 Times in 18 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsage
The leather side case with the pull-out ribbon? If so, no protector seems to work well with it -it's too snug.
|
I was referring to the stock case that came with the Pre. I just got it a week ago. The case doesn't look leather to me, but a cloth that is very leather-esque. It's not a side case, either. And there's definitely no ribbon... I just had to double check that.
Seems like there's just enough room for a screen protector on the front.
|
|
|
11/03/2009, 11:12 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 39
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by psm9
I've had the Boxwave screen protector on for 4 months. .... I used the Seidio Innocase for a while until it broke.
|
Did you use the Boxwave with the Seidio Innocase? Did it work/fit OK? I am a long time Boxwave user on my last 5 palm devices but I do have (and love) the Seidio case.
|
|
|
11/03/2009, 11:31 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: P'cola. , Fl
Posts: 1,968
Thanks: 98
Thanked 449 Times in 366 Posts
|
i choose phantom skins over the zagg IS , its easier to put on and looks so much better for sure. as far as boxwave goes ,i cant really say because ive never used it .
PS; i use seidio innocase with my skin and it works great( as long as you cut off the tabs).
__________________
Quote:
Be nice to the people that help you and give them some thanks !!!!! To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
PS; the thanks button is to the right ----->>>>>>>>
|
|
|
11/03/2009, 11:58 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 276
Thanks: 62
Thanked 48 Times in 29 Posts
|
Boxwave for sure! It's the only screen protector I'll use, but I also always have a case on my phone. Works great with innocase and other cases. It can even be washed and put back on the phone, doesn't need soap and doesn't leave residue on the phone when removed.
It covers the screen, but does not go over the edge, but that's not an issue for me since I always have a case along with my screen protector.
|
|
|
11/04/2009, 03:20 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,871
Thanks: 21
Thanked 20 Times in 18 Posts
|
Soo... the PhantomSkinz stays on for 4 months and then needs to be reapplied overnight?? But the Boxwave's edges don't exactly go with the curve of the Pre's screen... so lint gets under the edges.
I already know about the edges of BW screen protectors getting lint underneath, so I think I'll try the PS, especially due to the curvature of the Pre's screen (plus PS has coupon code "fall30" for 30% off and no s&h). But I don't get this whole "4 months" estimate...
|
|
|
11/04/2009, 03:23 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,871
Thanks: 21
Thanked 20 Times in 18 Posts
|
Oh yea... is anybody actually using the Boxwave anti-glare with their Pre?
I always preferred the anti-glare over the crystal with my previous Treos, Centro... but the Pre's screen looks too beautiful to put that matte finish on. Was anybody "crazy" enough to do that, tho? Is the touchscreen more responsive, like it was with the stylus on resistive screens??
|
|
|
11/07/2009, 08:29 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 145
Thanks: 22
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
|
I'm very happy with Phantom Skinz for the Pre. It went on easily and the bubbles just disappeared over time. It's tough and durable. It also doesn't interfere with finger swipes. It's almost invisible. I just hope that it lasts longer than 4 months. Never tried the Boxwave.
|
|
|
11/07/2009, 11:33 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 29
Thanks: 10
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I tried the skinomi and failed horribly, I guess because of the curvature of the pre the sides came out all crappy and I hated the liquid application so I just tore the thing off. I ordered boxwave crystal clear and I've been using it without any problems for a couple of week now.
It was very easy to apply on, with the screen on you can't tell if there is anything on there or not, but with the screen off you can see the outline of the screen protector, but the pre still looks good. Also it doesn't effect the touch screen at all, I'm still able to do everything on it. Overall I like boxwave and maybe later on down the line I'll try phantom skinz.
|
|
|
11/08/2009, 01:54 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 12
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
I haven't used the Phantom Skinz so I can't compare.
I love the Boxwave, though. I've had it on for 3 months and I carry my phone in my front pocket or shirt pocket, no holster. So it's been semi-abused in a daily basis and it still looks in virtually the same condition as it did when I put it on.
It's so clear and unobtrusive that I have to purposely look to see if it's there. A little lint building around the edges but not much, especially for carrying it against pocket fabric.
To me, the screen is the only thing I'm truly interested in protecting due to the touch screen functionality.
I'm very impressed so far.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:22 AM.
|
|