Home | Stories | Reviews | Treo™ Store | Accessories | Software | Discussion | Mobile | About | Search

 
 
 Pen Stylus  (3-Pack) SPE Pen Stylus for Treo 650
Just $7.95
Micro-USB Travel Charger, Touchstone Compatible Seidio Micro-USB Travel Charger,Touchstone Compatible for Palm Pixi, Pre
Just $19.95
HS-500 Bluetooth Headset BlackBerry HS-500 Bluetooth Headset
Just $69.95
Micro-USB Travel Charger SPE Micro-USB Travel Charger for Palm Pixi / Treo Pro, Treo 800w
Just $9.95
 
Old 08/04/2009, 11:41 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 129
Thanks: 15
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default Are quality apps guaranteed in the App Catalog? How?

If Palm keeps a more hands off approach than Apple how will it ensure that most applications are top grade?

Palm could set standards/guidelines but what happens if developers don't adhere to them? Should/would Palm reject the apps? If not, how will the 'bad eggs' be prevented from flooding the store?

I think this will be more of a challenge for Palm, especially if it's that much easier to create applications for their platform. Right?
Really mobile is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08/04/2009, 11:44 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
romanmb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 146
Thanks: 18
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
Default

There's a difference between guaranteeing quality apps and censoring out certain apps the way apple does...
romanmb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08/05/2009, 12:00 AM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 129
Thanks: 15
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by romanmb View Post
There's a difference between guaranteeing quality apps and censoring out certain apps the way apple does...
I know there's a difference. That's why my post is focused on quality apps and not on censorship of certain apps.

Do you think Palm will try to filter out less than stellar apps?
Really mobile is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08/05/2009, 12:13 AM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
windzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 533
Thanks: 65
Thanked 87 Times in 63 Posts
Default

If you meen ensuring all apps are
"quality" than I would hope not. Rather I would hope palm ensures that each user can easily find apps that the user themselves would consider quality.

One mans trash and all that nonsense.
windzilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08/05/2009, 12:23 AM   #5 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 497
Thanks: 31
Thanked 48 Times in 38 Posts
Default

???
Any/all apps should be allowed.By who's standard should one be allowed and one be disallowed? how is that any diff than what apple has done?
IMethos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08/05/2009, 12:28 AM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 853
Thanks: 332
Thanked 70 Times in 43 Posts
Default

I hope there will be quality apps. I have two I plan on submitting this upcoming weekend and hope mine are considered high quality, heh .
Kasracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08/05/2009, 01:17 AM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 335
Thanks: 4
Thanked 30 Times in 26 Posts
Default

I certainly hope they at least look at apps for operating integrity. If not, they could have users complaining about things they can't control and would cause more headache than it's worth.

But look at the Palm Dev forum. Palm is putting feelers out to developers to test the water as to what's ready, not ready, wanting to wait for pay option etc.
JKTex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08/05/2009, 02:10 AM   #8 (permalink)
Member
 
MilenkoD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dublin, Ca
Posts: 805
Thanks: 10
Thanked 46 Times in 34 Posts
Default

The downloading community will tell you the quality....just like reading reviews on Amazon before you buy. If it's crap, you can bet there'll be allot of vocalization. Palm need not get involved.
MilenkoD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08/05/2009, 02:23 AM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 129
Thanks: 15
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

People complain about the 'fart' apps in Apple's App Store and have mentioned that this won't be the case with Palm's App Catalog. It's not clear that Palm can/should prevent 'fart' apps...time will tell.
Really mobile is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08/05/2009, 02:30 AM   #10 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,527
Thanks: 153
Thanked 311 Times in 183 Posts
Default

Palm's in a bit of a different situation than Apple if they follow through on their stated goal of allowing sideloaded applications. That way, they can enforce quality and other standards in the App Catalog and be free from charges of... well, whatever.
__________________
Treo 600 > Treo 650 > HTC Mogul (idiot!) > HTC Touch Pro (idiot squared!) > PRE!

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
wynand32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08/06/2009, 02:15 PM   #11 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 129
Thanks: 15
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Default

I think that people will complain if Palm tries to enforce quality in the App Catalog. I think a key challenge they would have is explaining what is good vs. unacceptable 'quality.' As Windzilla pointed out above, "One mans trash and all that nonsense."
Really mobile is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08/06/2009, 02:57 PM   #12 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 159
Thanks: 9
Thanked 71 Times in 15 Posts
Default

"quality apps" - I would assume that to mean apps that don't have memory leaks or steal your phone numbers and post them to marketing sites, other security issues, etc.

Then Apple extends that to try and make sure developers follow guidelines so that apps behave somewhat similarly between app to app (aka "look and feel").

And then Apple extends that layer to filter out applications they don't want
wicketr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08/09/2009, 01:27 PM   #13 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: michigan
Posts: 763
Thanks: 5
Thanked 64 Times in 43 Posts
Default

Seeing as there are two ways to load apps to the device, the app catalog and side loading, I don't think there are any issues of the end user not having access to anything they desire to have on their device if someone is willing to make an app to fill that desire. There are ways to design apps to require some form of validation (if one wishes to charge for their app and prevent people from getting the app and not paying for it) and not have it in the app catalog. So I really don't see the app catalog as a potential hindrance to what apps the users can have. Obviously having an app in the app catalog is your maximum potential exposure for an app so that more people could be using/buying the app as a result. I intend on using people from the community to test apps and likely will put them all in the app catalog. At this time I haven't really decided what kinds of apps I want to make yet. Outside of copyright infringement and apps so buggy they can harm the device they get installed to, or require age restriction to use the app (**** for example) I don't think apps should be restricted. In fact my original impression about the app catalog was that it would be completely open, aka no approval process etc like apple since the whole approval process has been a negative thing in the sight of the public.
StoneRyno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08/09/2009, 01:31 PM   #14 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 117
Thanks: 16
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Default

This is a good thing. They have many people who can sift through apps. Once they get sent in, there should be someone testing out each app and doing some kind of rating system, and if they see that it is a useful/fun app, they give it a go.
mitch2k12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08/09/2009, 01:39 PM   #15 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 172
Thanks: 23
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
Default

I'm all for operating integrity but after that, if you don't find an app to be up to snuff, just don't use it.
Tricia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08/09/2009, 01:41 PM   #16 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 117
Thanks: 16
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Default

Exactly. Good point.
mitch2k12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08/09/2009, 01:59 PM   #17 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 104
Thanks: 50
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Default

I would imagine that there would definitely be some kind of QC; otherwise, Palm could find themselves in a very bad spot with customer complaints from adversely affected phones. But alas, I don't work for Palm so that's just conjecture at this point.
THAANSA3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08/09/2009, 02:46 PM   #18 (permalink)
Moderator
 
milominderbinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ↑ Music Player (Remix)
Posts: 1,713
Thanks: 652
Thanked 1,373 Times in 206 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wicketr View Post
"quality apps" - I would assume that to mean apps that don't have memory leaks or steal your phone numbers and post them to marketing sites, other security issues, etc.

Then Apple extends that to try and make sure developers follow guidelines so that apps behave somewhat similarly between app to app (aka "look and feel").

And then Apple extends that layer to filter out applications they don't want
I hope that Palm helps prevent security problems, memory leaks, etc.

But I hope that Palm does not enforce the webOS Fischer-Price look and feel. I think that the Fischer-Price looking apps will not do well against products that will use an over age 4 interface.

- Craig
__________________
Tips & TricksRingtones TipsBattery Life TipsVideos & MoviesHomebrew Apps & Patches
Posting TipsBackup & SyncingGreat Signal-AiraveSmilies
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
milominderbinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

~


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:07 AM.

Creating smartphone communities
Android Central - Android reviews, news and forums Crackberry - Blackberry news, reviews and community TiPb - iPhone news, accessory reviews & forums
Pre Central - Palm Pre Review, News and Community Treo Central - Treo & Centro News and Forums WMExperts - Windows Mobile Reviews & News

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
 
 

Copyright ©1999- TreoCentral. All rights reserved : Terms of Use : Privacy Policy

TREO and TreoCentral are trademarks or registered trademarks of palm, Inc. in the United States and other countries;
the TreoCentral mark and domain name are used under license from palm, Inc.
The views expressed on this website are solely those of the proprietor, or
contributors to the site, and do not necessarily reflect the views of palm, Inc.

Explore More: Crackberry | WMExperts | the iPhone Blog | Android Central | Smartphone Experts Combined Forums