Quote:
Originally Posted by RenardRouge
No... I say it as one of the reasons the software can be considered weak.
|
Okay, I don't see how that follows, but seriously: when you say that Palm "should have gotten it out more complete...", what exactly do you mean? Because, I'm pretty sure that Palm "got it out" as complete as they possibly could.
Or, are you proposing that Palm was perfectly capable of shipping WebOS with a more complete feature set (however you might define that), and that they purposefully chose not to release it that way? That perhaps they really had WebOS 2.0 or higher waiting in the wings, but decided to release 1.0 for... what... the heck of it? For kicks? Just to spite us?
I'm not even trying to defend Palm specifically here. I'm just amazed that folks are arguing about what Palm "should have done" with regard to how the Pre was released. It really seems like some people think that Palm either purposefully withheld some wonderfully perfected version of WebOS, or that they had the luxury of waiting to release something at all.
Or, they believe that Palm could and should have warped the fabric of time and space and released a version of WebOS that they hadn't yet had the time and resources to develop.