Home | Stories | Reviews | Treo™ Store | Accessories | Software | Discussion | Mobile | About | Search

 
 
Side Pouch Smartphone Experts Side Pouch for Palm Pre
Just $24.95
S1 Sun Visor Bluetooth Car Kit with Multipoint Blueant S1 Sun Visor Bluetooth Car Kit with Multipoint
Just $79.95
Car Charger Micro USB Smartphone Experts Car Charger Micro USB for Palm Pre / Treo Pro, Treo 800w
Just $12.95
Egrips for Palm Pre
Just $14.95
 
Old 01/20/2007, 01:10 PM   #1 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Tomtom 6 real slow with treo 680

I have a unlock treo 680 and loaded tomtom 6 after using the hex editor in other forum to make it compatible.

Now I have used treo 650 with tomtom 5 and it was great. With this new device and tomtom 6 it is real terrible for me. I have a 2GB (133x corsair- same card used with treo 650 and tomtom5) . It is so slow to navigate and write routes I feel something really wrong.

I also defrag my sd card with no noticeable change. it takes few mins to route and write. it takes few seconds to navigate from one screen to other. response is real slow dragging.

Please advice our experts.
vikas3576 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/20/2007, 01:33 PM   #2 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 210
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Are you using one big map (USA & Canada)? I used the DVD to load regions I used most. So I have New England, NY, etc. (Northeast) and then another map DB for West coast. The program routes and performs much faster since the database is 1/3 or less of the overall USA database. I kept the full DB on my 2GB card though for drives up to Canada (I hate having to change DB's at the border) but otherwise use the divide and conquer method to improve performance.
moderateinny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/20/2007, 01:50 PM   #3 (permalink)
Member
 
Merovingian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 618
Thanks: 10
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Default

In my case, TT6 works absolutely fine and snappy with my RiData 1GB miniSD 150X (w/SD adapter) and Route 66 BT GPS receiver.

My problem is with the Kingston 2GB SD Elite 50X I recently got. Performance is like night and day. TT6 is horrendously slow to do anything when using the 2GB SD 50X card, but when I use the RiData 1GB card, it's normal and snappy, just like TT5 was.

I am so bewildered. The point of getting the 2GB card was so that I would have one big card that held TT6, backups, photos, songs and so forth, because TT6 takes up about 930MB of my 1GB card. I have the whole USA and Canada on it.

Reformatting the 2GB card has produced no effect. I guess the 2GB card is the problem, even though it works fine in other uses.
I have resorted to just popping in my 1GB RiData card when I need to use TT6 and when done, switch to the 2GB card.

Next time, i'm definitely only buying RiData cards from now on.

I think some SD cards do not run at advertised speeds or are just too slow in performance.
__________________
.....Life is But Such Sweet Sorrow.....
Merovingian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/20/2007, 02:14 PM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default you guys think it is sd card?

This card was fine with my treo 650. I have a full detail map for north america (version 665) 1.4gb.
vikas3576 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/20/2007, 08:52 PM   #5 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 256
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Yeah. But it is only slow if you compare to TT5, however; TT5 has regional maps only. I recommend that you should try the same TT6 full details map on Treo 650. Voilà! Just name some: "not enough dynamic memory", "not enough DB cache", and "freezing in the middle of the road when it needed" etc....

I did experiments on 1GB Kodak, 2GB Sandisk Ultra, 4GB Transcend 150x. I used to give up the 4GB transcend running TT6 full details map on Treo 650. Now I'm happy to get it back on 680 and I'm also relief from listed pain in the @ss, too.

Here are some tips for speeding up:
1/ The bigger the card, the slower TT6 runs, hence
2/ Install it onto 1GB card, or
3/ Install regional maps.

Happy navigation.
__________________
Treo Maniac?
treoluv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/20/2007, 11:31 PM   #6 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 22
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default runs fine with 1gb card on treo 650 and two other 680

I have two other friends and we bought together. They also hav etreo 680 and it works fine with them using 1gb sd card. It also works fine on my treo 650. So is it my 2GB Sd card?
vikas3576 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/21/2007, 12:30 AM   #7 (permalink)
Member
 
Merovingian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 618
Thanks: 10
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Red face

Quote:
Originally Posted by treoluv View Post
Yeah. But it is only slow if you compare to TT5, however; TT5 has regional maps only. I recommend that you should try the same TT6 full details map on Treo 650. Voilà! Just name some: "not enough dynamic memory", "not enough DB cache", and "freezing in the middle of the road when it needed" etc....

I did experiments on 1GB Kodak, 2GB Sandisk Ultra, 4GB Transcend 150x. I used to give up the 4GB transcend running TT6 full details map on Treo 650. Now I'm happy to get it back on 680 and I'm also relief from listed pain in the @ss, too.

Here are some tips for speeding up:
1/ The bigger the card, the slower TT6 runs, hence
2/ Install it onto 1GB card, or
3/ Install regional maps.

Happy navigation.
I concur with your observation, the bigger the memory card, the slower TT6 runs. I now just use a 1GB card with all USA and Canada maps installed (over 930MB) with absolutely no problems at all, as opposed to using a 2GB card which is slow as hell.
__________________
.....Life is But Such Sweet Sorrow.....
Merovingian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/21/2007, 05:16 AM   #8 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merovingian View Post
I concur with your observation, the bigger the memory card, the slower TT6 runs. I now just use a 1GB card with all USA and Canada maps installed (over 930MB) with absolutely no problems at all, as opposed to using a 2GB card which is slow as hell.

Very important is the cluster size of your card. You will get the best results with the following cluster sizes. Use the DOS box for formatting your card. I`m using a Transcend 4 GB / 150x with best results (16K), even with big Western Europe map.

Less than 4 GB (FAT16):
2 GB SD (SanDisk) FAT16 mit 32K: format X: /FS:FAT /A:32K

4 GB and more (FAT32):
4 GB SD or SDHC (Transcend) FAT32 mit 16K: format X: /FS:FAT32 /A:16K


"X" is the drive letter.
Barnel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/21/2007, 08:25 AM   #9 (permalink)
Member
 
Merovingian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 618
Thanks: 10
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnel View Post
Very important is the cluster size of your card. You will get the best results with the following cluster sizes. Use the DOS box for formatting your card. I`m using a Transcend 4 GB / 150x with best results (16K), even with big Western Europe map.

Less than 4 GB (FAT16):
2 GB SD (SanDisk) FAT16 mit 32K: format X: /FS:FAT /A:32K

4 GB and more (FAT32):
4 GB SD or SDHC (Transcend) FAT32 mit 16K: format X: /FS:FAT32 /A:16K


"X" is the drive letter.
Interesting suggestion. I assume your directions for formatting relate to Windows.
How do i do this on a Mac? (via Terminal, maybe?)
__________________
.....Life is But Such Sweet Sorrow.....
Merovingian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/21/2007, 10:37 AM   #10 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merovingian View Post
Interesting suggestion. I assume your directions for formatting relate to Windows.
How do i do this on a Mac? (via Terminal, maybe?)
Sorry, I have no idea.
Barnel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/21/2007, 11:09 PM   #11 (permalink)
Member
 
Merovingian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 618
Thanks: 10
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnel View Post
Sorry, I have no idea.
Well, your formatting directions did the trick. I did as you suggested using my work PC and TT6 now performs snappy.

Kudos.
__________________
.....Life is But Such Sweet Sorrow.....
Merovingian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/23/2007, 10:22 PM   #12 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 314
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merovingian View Post
Well, your formatting directions did the trick. I did as you suggested using my work PC and TT6 now performs snappy.

Kudos.
Just curious - which filesystem and cluster size did you end up using? I've got a 2GB card with TT6 on the way, and I'd like to make sure it's as snappy as possible.
vebix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/24/2007, 08:11 PM   #13 (permalink)
Member
 
khaytsus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,659
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I've formatted my 2G card with 32k, it won't go any smaller... If I try 16k it says it's too small for FAT16. FAT32 seemed to be even slower.

Maybe I'll try Fat32 again for kicks.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
khaytsus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/24/2007, 11:20 PM   #14 (permalink)
Member
 
Merovingian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 618
Thanks: 10
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mportune View Post
Just curious - which filesystem and cluster size did you end up using? I've got a 2GB card with TT6 on the way, and I'd like to make sure it's as snappy as possible.
I used this one:

Less than 4 GB (FAT16):
2 GB SD (SanDisk) FAT16 mit 32K: format X: /FS:FAT /A:32K

and TT6 is back to normal. I have a 2GB Kingston Elite 50x card, by the way.
__________________
.....Life is But Such Sweet Sorrow.....
Merovingian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/25/2007, 08:42 AM   #15 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 314
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merovingian View Post
I used this one:

Less than 4 GB (FAT16):
2 GB SD (SanDisk) FAT16 mit 32K: format X: /FS:FAT /A:32K

and TT6 is back to normal. I have a 2GB Kingston Elite 50x card, by the way.
Interesting. On my 2GB Transcend 150x, if I format with 32K FAT16, it slows *way* down from the default Windows FAT format...

VFSMark at normal FAT16 - 785
VFSMark at FAT16 @ 32K - 484

The main change is in the File Create and File Delete tests:

FAT16:
File Create: 1561%
File Delete: 1416%

FAT16 @ 32K:
File Create: 75%
File Delete: 59%

I'm still not sure if I have a problem card, or if PalmOS just hates cards larger than 2GB. My 1GB card (which was supposed to be only 32x) just *flies* past this Transcend 150x card.
vebix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/25/2007, 10:40 AM   #16 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 80
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Is there a way to check the current SD card cluster size?
jfme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/25/2007, 01:29 PM   #17 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 314
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfme View Post
Is there a way to check the current SD card cluster size?
hmm, that I don't know. It would be interesting to see was the default PalmOS format is doing, vs. others.
vebix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/27/2007, 05:53 AM   #18 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfme View Post
Is there a way to check the current SD card cluster size?
you can check the parameters of formating with the following command. Use the DOS box. X is the drive letter.

chkdsk X:
Barnel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/27/2007, 06:47 AM   #19 (permalink)
Member
 
Bronxboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 143
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Also try lowering the amount of POIs. Btw anybody got a copy of tom tom speed camera POIs for Switzerland? I had them but the data got corrupted and I lost my backup.
__________________
Treo 650, 4GB SD card

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Bronxboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01/27/2007, 10:01 AM   #20 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 314
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnel View Post
you can check the parameters of formating with the following command. Use the DOS box. X is the drive letter.

chkdsk X:
Can somebody run this on a 1GB card formatted from a Treo 650? (standard ROM, no FAT32) I have a 680 now but I'd like to know what cluster size my 650 used to use, since it had fabulous SD performance.
vebix is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

~


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 PM.

Creating smartphone communities
Android Central - Android reviews, news and forums Crackberry - Blackberry news, reviews and community TiPb - iPhone news, accessory reviews & forums
Pre Central - Palm Pre Review, News and Community Treo Central - Treo & Centro News and Forums WMExperts - Windows Mobile Reviews & News

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
 
 

Copyright ©1999- TreoCentral. All rights reserved : Terms of Use : Privacy Policy

TREO and TreoCentral are trademarks or registered trademarks of palm, Inc. in the United States and other countries;
the TreoCentral mark and domain name are used under license from palm, Inc.
The views expressed on this website are solely those of the proprietor, or
contributors to the site, and do not necessarily reflect the views of palm, Inc.

Explore More: Crackberry | WMExperts | the iPhone Blog | Android Central | Smartphone Experts Combined Forums